Skip to main content

Featured Story

Produced by Daniel Aharonoff & Mogul Media AI

Tesla Model 3 and Model X Incentives for IRA Credit

Tesla’s New Incentives: A Game Changer for the Model 3 Performance and Model X AWD As the electric vehicle market continues to evolve at a dizzying pace, Tesla is once again at the forefront of innovation. The latest buzz surrounds unique incentives rolled out for the reengineered Model 3 Performance and the Model X All-Wheel Drive (AWD) . These offerings not only enhance the allure of these remarkable vehicles but also align with the broader goals of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Unpacking the Incentives Tesla’s approach to these incentives is multifaceted, addressing both consumer appeal and regulatory compliance. Here’s what you need to know: Eligibility for IRA Credits : The Model 3 Performance and Model X AWD have been strategically positioned to qualify for tax credits under the IRA, making them even more attractive to eco-conscious consumers. Performance Meets Affordability : These incentives are not just about saving money; they enhance the overall ownership exp
Post a Comment
Read more
Produced by Daniel Aharonoff & Mogul Media AI

Tesla Responds to Biased LA Times Article on Elon Musk's Settlement with Hothi

As someone who has been closely following the Elon Musk and Randeep Hothi lawsuit, I was disappointed to read the recent article published by the Los Angeles Times. The article was misleading and biased towards Hothi, and I believe it was important for Tesla to set the record straight. In response to the article, Tesla tweeted that Hothi accepted a "998" offer under California law, which shifts litigation costs to the losing party. This settlement was not a victory for Hothi and his lawyers, but rather an admission of defeat.

The LA Times Article was Misleading

The LA Times article focused heavily on Hothi's side of the story, painting him as the victim and Musk as the aggressor. However, this is far from the truth. Hothi had a history of harassing Tesla employees and even trespassed on the company's property. Musk and Tesla were well within their rights to file a lawsuit against him.

Furthermore, the article failed to mention that Hothi accepted a "998" offer, which is a clear indication that he did not have a strong case and was likely to lose in court. The fact that he accepted this offer means that he was willing to admit defeat and pay the litigation costs.

Tesla's Response was Necessary

Tesla's response to the LA Times article was necessary to set the record straight. The company has been the target of biased and misleading reporting in the past, and it is important for them to defend themselves when necessary.

The tweet was short and to the point, but it effectively highlighted the fact that Hothi's settlement was not a victory, but rather an admission of defeat. This was an important message to convey to the public, who may have been misled by the LA Times article.

Conclusion

As a Tesla enthusiast and supporter, I believe that it is important to hold the media accountable for their reporting. Biased and misleading reporting can have a significant impact on public perception, and it is important to set the record straight when necessary. Tesla's response to the LA Times article was necessary and effective, and I hope that it will help to clarify the truth about the settlement between Musk and Hothi.

Support Me, TeslaDan, by Using My Referral Link

If you're considering purchasing a Tesla vehicle or any Tesla products, I have a unique opportunity for you to support me, TeslaDan, a devoted Tesla owner. I'm sharing my personal Tesla Referral Link with you, my fellow blog readers.

By clicking on my Referral Link and mentioning that I, TeslaDan, sent you, you'll not only join the Tesla family but also show your support for me and my passion for Tesla. Your support means a lot and I appreciate it!

Ready to make the switch? Click on my Tesla Referral Link now!

Comments

Post a Comment